Return-Path: Received: (qmail 503 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2002 09:19:07 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 13 Nov 2002 09:19:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 12427 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2002 09:21:21 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Nov 2002 09:21:20 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18Btgp-0004XN-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:20:03 +0000 Received: from [212.135.6.12] (helo=smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18Btgo-0004XE-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:20:02 +0000 Received: from tnt-13-120.easynet.co.uk ([212.134.22.120] helo=erica) by smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18Btgl-000Pv5-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:19:59 +0000 Message-ID: <000001c28af5$dc863a00$781686d4@erica> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:30:49 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Puzzles Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group John said >Fine! I personally don't mind as I find them interesting - the question is do the majority of the reflector users mind the scope of the reflector to broaden to include such technical intrigues? I must admit that it is better than spam and helps to keep the brain going between M-Class flares and other discussions more relevant to LF.... I'm happy to change the unwritten scope for the reflector if we don't otherwise have any serious dissenters, so (brief) comments please either way ... I find them interesting and happy to see them as long as it is not overdone. Much better than spam and infinitely better that the slanging that used to be a feature of this reflector. Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail Web PS The original last line of Ode to G3JKV by boffin scans better.